8/7/2023 0 Comments Drone deploy vs pix4d![]() ![]() ![]() Model quality is controlled mostly by the flight plan and resulting images. We also noted that we must adapt the flight to opendronemap requirements, wich are different from pix4d and agisoft, tipically with higher overlaping between images. So I agree, opendronemap is great for in-house operations. ![]() So products must be accurate and readable by the software, and there is not interest in making them ready for a client as a final product. But we tipically take the resulting products (Orthophoto, point cloud and DEMs) into different software to continue processing. It depends on the use case, for instance we were using pix4d and agisoft in an industrial enviroment (mining) and after a long testing process now we can use opendronemap. However, if we assume that your drone GPS coordinates have a relative accuracy of ~0.2 meters, and turn the knobs up on features, we get some substantially better results: That doesn’t mean it is the best tool for your use case: that’s a different matter altogether. Indeed, given the subsidization via parent companies and/or VC funding of some of our closed-source competition, there’s a high probability that OpenDroneMap is among very few projects in the space that have a functional business model (Piero jokes it’s the only profitable photogrammetry tool). FOSS projects, like OpenDroneMap can be (and is in our case) a commercial endeavor and professional tool. It’s a little early to draw that conclusion, and a bit dismissive. It would perhaps suit a hobbyist or inhouse operations. While WebODM is able to produce a viable alternative to many of the leading photogrammetry apps at a fraction of the price, it does still have a fair way to come to reach being ‘presentable to client’. Options: auto-boundary: true, camera-lens: brown, dsm: true, matcher-neighbors: 32, mesh-octree-depth: 12, mesh-size: 300000, min-num-features: 20000, pc-quality: high, resize-to: -1, texturing-data-term: area, texturing-keep-unseen-faces: true texturing_skip_local_seam_leveling: False texturing_skip_global_seam_leveling: False texturing_outlier_removal_type: gauss_clamping Using Firefox99 and windows 10 NT10.0 Hosting WebODM through Vultr on Ubuntu 20.04 On the way I plan ondoing comparisons to other software too, but for the time being I am comparing to Drone Deploy. I plan on uploading this tutorial to Youtube and I am nearly complete.Ī challenge I am facing is trying to get my 3d model up to a satisfactory standard. I am making a tutorial on how to create a relatively simple workflow from drone flyover, to processing via Webodm Lightning, through to client interaction with WebODM through virtual server. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |